Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- archive_types [2024/04/27 08:48] – [What is ZSTD?] johnsanc
+++ archive_types [2024/04/27 08:49] – [How does the compression ratio of ZSTD compare to Deflate and LZMA?] johnsanc
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 ==== How does the compression ratio of ZSTD compare to Deflate and LZMA? ====
-ZSTD level 19 has a compression ratio right in between Deflate level 9 and LZMA level 9. However, since ZSTD is multithreaded its much faster to compress compared to LZMA and often times faster than Deflate. ZSTD also decompresses much faster than both LZMA and Deflate. Example statistics for the redump.org PlayStation collection:
+ZSTD level 19 has a compression ratio right in between Deflate level 9 and LZMA level 9. However, since ZSTD is multi-threaded its much faster to compress compared to LZMA and often faster than Deflate. ZSTD also decompresses much faster than both LZMA and Deflate. Example statistics for the redump.org PlayStation collection:
 ^ Format         ^  Size (GiB)  ^  Compression Ratio  ^  Space Savings  ^
@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 | Solid LZMA 7z  |  2,513.54    |  1.8462             |  45.83%         |
-The diagram below shows the relationship of single-threaded compression speed and ratio. In the case of zstd compression, most use cases would involve multiple workers on modern hardware and compress much faster. The three callouts in the diagram represent the compression levels that RomVault uses for each method.
+The diagram below shows the relationship of single-threaded compression speed and ratio. Most ZSTD use cases would involve multiple workers (threads) on modern hardware and compress much faster. The three callouts in the diagram represent the compression levels that RomVault uses for each method.
 {{:diagrams:zstd.png?nolink&1000|}}
 ==== Why is ZSTD slow when compressing archives with many smaller files? ====